Tok essay planning
Counterclaim 01 This should be an argument against Claim 1. Okay here we go Someone said they saw you there, You admitted to lying to your mom about candy one time and You are pretty good at computers.
Natural science can be less reliable because it relies on observation.
Tok essay outline
Counterclaim 01 This should be an argument against Claim 1. The lawyers would use evidence to support each of these claims and counterclaims. You dont need lots of detail here, the point should be quite simple and clear, the detail comes later. Use the same approach you saw in paragraphs 2 and 3. The structure on this page will give you a strong foundation for your essay and then we're going to make your essay as insightful as possible. Try to strike a balance between the two in your essay. Then you can explore these aspects in your essay. Examples should be personal, specific, precise and real. Repeat this structure for the rest of the main body of the essay. What is your short answer to the prescribed title, your thesis. Different cultural perspectives can be a good source of counterclaims! However, many of these same people would say that they don't have a strong understanding of either of these two fields. It helps to think of the essay as though you're showing the most interesting bits of a conversation between two smart people, about how we know things. Okay here we go
Making sure your evidence actually supports your claim is one of the toughest aspects of the essay. The structure on this page will give you a strong foundation for your essay and then we're going to make your essay as insightful as possible.
Some of your examples should be from research while some should be from your own personal experience. Both of these fields rely on rigorous methodologies.
Tok essay planning
That might help me say interesting things later on in the essay--for example in the conclusion. You definitely do need this in the introduction - try to come to a realistic, balanced, sensible overall answer to the KI. I would also look up the term "convincing". Response This is where you evaluate how much of a problem the counterclaim is for your argument. However, if your lawyer was a ToK student they would also be explaining reasons why you might be guilty the counterclaims. Did you have a conversation with your or hear a story from your grandfather? Either way you will need some new evidence here to support what you are saying. Your response can argue that the counterclaim is simply wrong or it may take the form of finding a compromise between the CC and your original point.
Is it a major attack or not much to worry about? The essay contains two body sections or "developments". Use the same approach you saw in paragraphs 2 and 3. The courtroom analogy The TOK essay is about knowledge how we come to know things.
based on 107 review